ANY and ALL opposition to the proposed stipulation in the Jemez Mountain Electric Cooperative/Pueblo de San Ildefonso Electric Easement Agreement has to reach the PRC Hearing Examiner by tomorrow COB, Monday, March 3, 2014. Carolyn Glick will be the determining body that will make a recommendation to the PRC Commissioners on this case. This recommendation(s) is what they will vote on.
Please note, the PRC will not be voting on an easement amount more within fair market value. They will not be voting to reduce the $3,200/per acre value that future utilities will be based on in our area. They will only be voting on the cost recovery model used to pass the cost to our community, which is still unfair and unreasonable.
Why are these emails so important? The cost for this Easement Agreement has not been included in our electric bills! Please consider the amounts you are being charged already! Opposing will send the message that any cost recovery of such astronomical easement amounts has too big of an impact on our community, period!
House Bill 356 may have not made it to the House floor for a vote but the battle for fairness and a voice is still alive and well! The taxpayers who emailed Representatives showed the power in numbers. Please continue to show our Community's power by getting involved and sending the following email to Ms. Glick at carolyn.glick@state.nm.us;
Message:
Case # 13-00202-UT
I oppose the proposed stipulation in the Jemez Mountain Electric Cooperative/Pueblo de San Ildefonso advice notice.
Name/Signature
(TYPE YOUR NAME HERE)
___________________________________________________________
El Rancho Community Member
Please note, the PRC will not be voting on an easement amount more within fair market value. They will not be voting to reduce the $3,200/per acre value that future utilities will be based on in our area. They will only be voting on the cost recovery model used to pass the cost to our community, which is still unfair and unreasonable.
Why are these emails so important? The cost for this Easement Agreement has not been included in our electric bills! Please consider the amounts you are being charged already! Opposing will send the message that any cost recovery of such astronomical easement amounts has too big of an impact on our community, period!
House Bill 356 may have not made it to the House floor for a vote but the battle for fairness and a voice is still alive and well! The taxpayers who emailed Representatives showed the power in numbers. Please continue to show our Community's power by getting involved and sending the following email to Ms. Glick at carolyn.glick@state.nm.us;
Message:
Case # 13-00202-UT
I oppose the proposed stipulation in the Jemez Mountain Electric Cooperative/Pueblo de San Ildefonso advice notice.
Name/Signature
(TYPE YOUR NAME HERE)
___________________________________________________________
El Rancho Community Member
No comments:
Post a Comment